Download:
pdf |
pdf26560
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 118 / Monday, June 23, 2025 / Notices
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
All comments submitted in response
to this notice are a matter of public
record. The USPTO will include or
summarize each comment in the request
to OMB to approve this information
collection. Before including an address,
phone number, email address, or other
personally identifiable information (PII)
in a comment, be aware that the entire
comment—including PII—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you may ask in your comment to
withhold PII from public view, the
USPTO cannot guarantee that it will be
able to do so.
Justin Isaac,
Information Collections Officer, Office of the
Chief Administrative Officer, United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2025–11490 Filed 6–20–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2012–0054]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Extension of Collection;
Comment Request; Safety Standard for
Automatic Residential Garage Door
Operators
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Information
Collection; Request for Comment.
AGENCY:
As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the
Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC or Commission) requests
comments on a proposed extension of
approval of information collection
requirements associated with the Safety
Standard for Automatic Residential
Garage Door Operators. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
previously approved the collection of
information under control number
3041–0125. OMB’s most recent
extension of approval will expire on
September 30, 2025. The Commission
will consider all comments received in
response to this notice before requesting
an extension of this collection of
information from OMB.
DATES: Submit comments on the
collection of information by August 22,
2025.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2012–
0054, within 60 days of publication of
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:29 Jun 20, 2025
Jkt 265001
this notice by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit through this website:
confidential business information, trade
secret information, or other sensitive or
protected information that you do not
want to be available to the public. The
Commission typically does not accept
comments submitted by email, except as
described below.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier/Written
Submissions: CPSC encourages you to
submit electronic comments by using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal. You
may, however, submit comments by
mail/hand delivery/courier to: Office of
the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East-West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814;
telephone (301) 504–7479.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. CPSC
may post all comments without change,
including any personal identifiers,
contact information, or other personal
information provided, to: https://
www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
submit confidential business
information, trade secret information, or
other sensitive or protected information
that you do not want to be available to
the public, you may submit such
comments by mail, hand delivery, or
courier, or you may email them to cpscos@cpsc.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://
www.regulations.gov, insert docket
number CPSC–2012–0054 into the
‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Gillham, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East-West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301)
504–7791, or by email to: pra@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CPSC
seeks to renew the following currently
approved collection of information:
Title: Standard for Automatic
Residential Garage Door Operators.
OMB Number: 3041–0125.
Type of Review: Renewal of
collection.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: Manufacturers,
importers, and private labelers of
automatic residential garage door
operators.
General Description of Collection: On
December 22, 1992, the Commission
issued rules prescribing requirements
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for a reasonable testing program to
support certificates of compliance with
the Safety Standard for Automatic
Residential Garage Door Operators (57
FR 60449). These regulations also
require manufacturers, importers, and
private labelers of residential garage
door operators to establish and maintain
records to demonstrate compliance with
the requirements for testing to support
certification of compliance. 16 CFR part
1211, subparts B and C.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
An estimated 17 firms that conduct
performance tests and maintain records
based on the test results to retain UL
certification and verify compliance with
the rule.
Estimated Time per Response: Based
on staff’s review of industry sources,
each respondent will spend an
estimated 40 hours (35 hours for PRA
burden associated with testing and 5
hours for recordkeeping) annually on
the collection of information related to
the rule.
Total Estimated Annual Burden: 680
hours (17 firms × 40 hours).
Total Estimated Annual Cost to
Respondents: Using compensation data
available from the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS), Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation (December
2024, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/
archives/ecec_03142025.pdf), staff
estimates that the total annual cost of
the PRA burden associated with the
testing requirement is estimated to be
about $45,101, based on an hourly rate
of $75.80 as total compensation for
management, professional, and related
occupations in goods-producing private
industries (17 firms × 35 hours ×
$75.80). Staff also estimates that the
total annual cost of the recordkeeping
burden is estimated to be about $3,472
based on an hourly rate of $40.85 for
sales and office workers (17 firms × 5
hours × $40.85). Therefore, the total
burden cost is about $48,573 ($45,101 +
$3,472). This estimate includes
professional and clerical time that may
be spent to retrieve product data from
automated or other records systems,
explain firm practices/policies intended
to assure compliance with the standard,
or accompany Commission personnel
during inspections.
Request for Comments: The
Commission solicits written comments
from all interested persons about the
proposed collection of information. The
Commission specifically solicits
information relevant to the following
topics:
• whether the collection of
information described above is
necessary for the proper performance of
the Commission’s functions, including
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 118 / Monday, June 23, 2025 / Notices
whether the information would have
practical utility;
• whether the estimated burden of the
proposed collection of information is
accurate;
• whether the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected
could be enhanced; and
• whether the burden imposed by the
collection of information could be
minimized by use of automated,
electronic or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms of
information technology.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2025–11447 Filed 6–20–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
Notice of Public Meetings for Pacific
Missile Range Facility and Ko¯ke1e Park
Geophysical Observatory
Environmental Impact Statement (ID#
EISX–007–17–USN–1749043386)
Department of the Navy (DoN),
Department of Defense (DoD); National
Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
regulations implemented by the DoN
and NASA, as joint lead agencies, DoN
and NASA have prepared and filed with
the United States (U.S.) Environmental
Protection Agency a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)
for retaining the use of state lands on
Kaua1i, Hawai1i (HI) in support current
operations that occur on these lands.
The Draft EIS includes an analysis of the
potential environmental effects
associated with the continued long-term
DoD use of 8,172 acres of State lands on
Kaua1i for operational continuity and
sustainment (in support of continued
military training, testing, and facility
operations) at the Pacific Missile Range
Facility (PMRF), and the continued
long-term NASA use of 23 acres of State
lands on Kaua1i in support of continued
operations (including measurements of
the Earth1s rotation and local land
motion) at the Ko¯ke1e Park Geophysical
Observatory (KPGO). As the Proposed
Action involves State lands, the EIS is
a joint NEPA and Hawai1i
Environmental Policy Act (HEPA) (as
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:29 Jun 20, 2025
Jkt 265001
governed by Hawai1i Revised Statutes
(HRS) Chapter 343), and Hawai1i
Administrative Rules (HAR)
(implementing HRS Chapter 343)
document; therefore, the public review
processes will run concurrently and will
jointly meet NEPA and HEPA
requirements.
DATES: The 48-day public comment
period begins June 20, 2025, and ends
August 7, 2025. In support of NEPA and
HEPA requirements, in-person public
meetings (with some of the meetings
live-broadcasted) will be held in Kaua1i,
HI from July 15 through 17, 2025, to
provide an overview of the Draft EIS,
answer questions from the public, and
provide the public an opportunity to
provide oral comments. Each meeting
will also provide an opportunity to
learn how the DoN and NASA are
complying with the Section 106 process
of the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA) and to comment on potential
effects on historic properties. The public
can submit comments during the Draft
EIS public review and comment period
at one of the public meetings,
electronically via the project website
(https://pmrf-kpgo-eis.com/), or via U.S.
mail. Public comments on the Draft EIS
must be postmarked or received online
by 11:59 p.m. HI Standard Time (HST)
Thursday, August 7, 2025, for
consideration in the Final EIS.
Three in-person public meetings with
a virtual component will be held as
follows:
1. July 15, 2025, from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m.
HST at Kaua1i Veterans Center, 3215
Kaua1i Veterans Memorial Highway,
Lı¯hu1e, HI 96766;
2. July 16, 2025, from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m.
HST at Kekaha Neighborhood Center,
8130 Elepaio Road, Kekaha, HI 96752;
3. July 17, 2025, from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m.
HST at Sheraton Coconut Beach Resort,
650 Aleka Loop, Kapa1a, HI 96746.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the Draft EIS
may be provided at the public meetings,
electronically through the project
website at: https://pmrf-kpgo-eis.com/,
or by U.S. mail to: Naval Facilities
Engineering Systems Command,
Hawai1i; Attention: PMRF and KPGO
Real Estate EIS Project Manager, Ms.
Kerry Ling; 400 Marshall Road, Building
X–11; Pearl Harbor, HI 96860.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DoN: Commander, Navy Region Hawai1i,
Attn: Mr. Daniel Sanford, Outreach
Public Affairs Specialist, by telephone
(808–473–2890) or email
(Daniel.f.sanford.civ@us.navy.mil and
chrh.pao@us.navy.mil).
NASA: Shari A. Miller, NASA; EIS
Project Manager, by telephone (757–
824–2327) or email (Shari.A.Miller@
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26561
nasa.gov), or visit the project website:
https://pmrf-kpgo-eis.com/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The DoN’s
purpose for the Proposed Action is to
maintain long-term DoD use of 8,172
acres of State lands (including
leaseholds and easement lands) on
Kaua1i, HI for operational continuity and
sustainment of the military readiness
mission. NASA’s purpose for the
Proposed Action is to maintain longterm use of 23 acres of State land
(including leaseholds and easement
lands) on Kaua1i, HI for continued
operations of KPGO. The Proposed
Action is needed because the existing
real estate agreements for these state
lands are set to expire between 2027 and
2030. The Navy use of these state lands
is required to maintain technological
and safety capabilities supporting PMRF
training and testing. For NASA, these
state lands are critical to maintain data
collection efforts of global significance.
It also ensures the continued
conservation management by the DoN
and NASA of natural and cultural
resources on these lands.
For the State of HI Board of Land and
Natural Resources (BLNR), in addition
to its role as the lessor of state lands, the
proposed real estate action presents an
opportunity for the agency to secure a
revenue source to support its
management of public lands and
associated environmental and
conservation programs. Fees from leases
and easements would be put into a state
fund, as required by law. Twenty
percent of ceded land revenue (fees
from the leaseholds and easement lands)
would go to the Office of Hawaiian
Affairs, and the rest to the Special Land
Development Fund, as required by law.
By ensuring continued DoN and
NASA operations on Kaua1i, the real
estate action would also preserve local
jobs and income for the residents of
Kaua1i, financially contribute to the
overall economic well-being of Kaua1i,
and maintain continued conservation
management of natural and cultural
resources on state lands at no cost to the
State of HI.
The DoN and NASA are considering
two Action Alternatives that are carried
forward for analysis in the EIS, along
with the No Action Alternative. The
type of real estate agreement
differentiates the alternatives.
Alternative 1 (Succeeding Current
Real Estate Agreements): The DoN and
NASA would secure new real estate
agreements with the State of HI for the
same areas they currently hold in
leaseholds and easements with no
change to current footprint or use of
state lands.
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
File Type | application/pdf |
File Modified | 2025-06-21 |
File Created | 2025-06-21 |