Download:
pdf |
pdfFederal Register / Vol. 90, No. 175 / Friday, September 12, 2025 / Notices
Tanner Creek. The proposed
continuation of the program would
indicate best management practices to
minimize adverse effects on the Snake
River Sockeye Salmon Evolutionarily
Significant Unit.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
directed to the NMFS Sustainable
Fisheries Division, 1201 NE Lloyd
Blvd., Portland, OR 97232. The
documents are also available on the
internet at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/snakeriver-sockeye-salmon-productionprogram.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andreas Raisch at (503) 230–5405 or by
email at andreas.raisch@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
• Snake River Sockeye
(Oncorhynchus nerka): endangered,
naturally and artificially propagated.
• Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha):
threatened, naturally and artificially
propagated;
Æ Snake River Spring/Summer run:
threatened, naturally and artificially
propagated;
• Snake River Steelhead (O. mykiss):
threatened, naturally and artificially
propagated;
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Background
Section 9 of the ESA and Federal
regulations prohibit the ‘‘taking’’ of a
species listed as endangered or
threatened. The term ‘‘take’’ is defined
under the ESA to mean harass, harm,
pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap,
capture, or collect, or to attempt to
engage in any such conduct. NMFS may
make exceptions to the take prohibitions
in section 9 of the ESA for programs that
are approved by NMFS under section
10(a)(1)(A) of the ESA (50 CFR 222.308).
The operators and funding agencies,
including Idaho Department of Fish and
Game, The Shoshone-Bannock Tribe,
Oregon Department of Fish and
Wildlife, NMFS’s Northwest Fisheries
Science Center and Bonneville Power
Administration (BPA), submitted a
Hatchery and Genetic Management Plan
to NMFS pursuant to ESA Section
10(a)(1)(A) for hatchery activities in the
Snake River basin (88 FR 53477, August
8, 2023). An EA was also prepared
pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) by NMFS for the
Snake River sockeye salmon hatchery
program.
The programs are intended to
contribute to the survival and recovery
of Snake River Sockeye salmon in the
Snake River basin. The proposed
program would maintain the Snake
River sockeye salmon captive
broodstock, collect and spawn adult
sockeye salmon returning to the Snake
River basin, rear juveniles, and release
eggs, juveniles, and adult fish in upper
Salmon River basin lakes as well as into
17:10 Sep 11, 2025
Jkt 265001
[FR Doc. 2025–17636 Filed 9–11–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
ESA-Listed Species Covered in This
Notice
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Dated: September 9, 2025.
Jennifer Quan,
Regional Administrator, West Coast Region,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2012–0054]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Extension of Collection;
Safety Standard for Automatic
Residential Garage Door Operators
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the
Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC or Commission) announces that
the Commission has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request for extension of
approval of information collection
requirements associated with the Safety
Standard for Automatic Residential
Garage Door Operators. OMB previously
approved the collection of information
under control number 3041–0125.
OMB’s most recent extension of
approval will expire on September 30,
2025. On June 23, 2025, CPSC published
a notice in the Federal Register to
announce the agency’s intention to seek
extension of approval of the collection
of information. The Commission
received one, out of scope, public
comment. Therefore, by publication of
this notice, the Commission announces
that CPSC has submitted to the OMB a
request for extension of approval of that
collection of information.
DATES: Submit comments on the
collection of information by October 14,
2025.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments about
this request by email: OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov or fax: 202–
395–6881. Comments by mail should be
sent to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk
Officer for the CPSC, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC
20503. Written comments that are sent
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44171
to OMB also should be submitted
electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, under Docket No.
CPSC–2012–0054.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Gillham, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East-West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301)
504–7791, or by email to: pra@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CPSC
seeks to renew the following currently
approved collection of information:
Title: Standard for Automatic
Residential Garage Door Operators.
OMB Number: 3041–0125.
Type of Review: Renewal of
collection.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: Manufacturers,
importers, and private labelers of
automatic residential garage door
operators.
General Description of Collection: On
December 22, 1992, the Commission
issued rules prescribing requirements
for a reasonable testing program to
support certificates of compliance with
the Safety Standard for Automatic
Residential Garage Door Operators (57
FR 60449). These regulations also
require manufacturers, importers, and
private labelers of residential garage
door operators to establish and maintain
records to demonstrate compliance with
the requirements for testing to support
certification of compliance. 16 CFR part
1211, subparts B and C.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
An estimated 17 firms that conduct
performance tests and maintain records
based on the test results to retain
Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (UL)
certification and verify compliance with
the rule.
Estimated Time per Response: Based
on staff’s review of industry sources,
each respondent will spend an
estimated 40 hours (35 hours for PRA
burden associated with testing and 5
hours for recordkeeping) annually on
the collection of information related to
the rule.
Total Estimated Annual Burden: 680
hours (17 firms × 40 hours).
Total Estimated Annual Cost to
Respondents: Using compensation data
available from the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS), Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation (December
2024, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/
archives/ecec_03142025.pdf), staff
estimates that the total annual cost of
the PRA burden associated with the
testing requirement is estimated to be
about $45,101, based on an hourly rate
of $75.80 as total compensation for
management, professional, and related
occupations in goods-producing private
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
44172
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 175 / Friday, September 12, 2025 / Notices
industries (17 firms × 35 hours ×
$75.80). Staff also estimates that the
total annual cost of the recordkeeping
burden is estimated to be about $3,472
based on an hourly rate of $40.85 for
sales and office workers (17 firms × 5
hours × $40.85). Therefore, the total
burden cost is about $48,573 ($45,101 +
$3,472). This estimate includes
professional and clerical time that may
be spent to retrieve product data from
automated or other records systems,
explain firm practices/policies intended
to assure compliance with the standard,
or accompany Commission personnel
during inspections.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2025–17665 Filed 9–11–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2012–0026]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Extension of Approval of
Information Collection; Requirements
Pertaining to Third Party Conformity
Assessment Bodies
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Consumer
Product Safety Commission (CPSC or
Commission) announces that the
Commission has submitted to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) a
request for extension of approval of
information collection requirements
pertaining to third party conformity
assessment bodies. OMB previously
approved the collection of information
under Control Number 3041–0156.
OMB’s most recent extension of
approval will expire on September 30,
2025. On June 10, 2025, CPSC published
a notice in the Federal Register to
announce the agency’s intention to seek
extension of approval of the collection
of information. The Commission did not
receive any public comments.
Therefore, by publication of this notice,
the Commission announces that CPSC
has submitted to the OMB a request for
extension of approval of that collection
of information.
DATES: Submit comments on the
collection of information by October 14,
2025.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments about
this request by email: OIRA_
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Sep 11, 2025
Jkt 265001
submission@omb.eop.gov or fax: 202–
395–6881. Comments by mail should be
sent to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk
Officer for the CPSC, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC
20503. Written comments that are sent
to OMB also should be submitted
electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, under Docket No.
CPSC–2012–0026.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Gillham, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East-West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301)
504–7791, or by email to: pra@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CPSC
seeks to renew the following currently
approved collection of information:
Title: Requirements Pertaining to
Third Party Conformity Assessment
Bodies.
OMB Number: 3041–0156.
Type of Review: Renewal of
collection.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: Third party
conformity assessment bodies seeking
acceptance of accreditation or
continuing accreditation.
General Description of Collection: On
March 12, 2013, the Commission issued
a rule Pertaining to Third Party
Conformity Assessment Bodies (78 FR
15836). The rule established the general
requirements concerning third party
conformity assessment bodies, such as
the requirements and procedures for
CPSC acceptance of the accreditation of
a third party conformity assessment
body, and the rule prescribed adverse
actions that might be imposed against
CPSC-accepted third party conformity
assessment bodies. The rule also
amended the audit requirements for
third party conformity assessment
bodies and amended the CPSC’s
regulation for inspections. CPSC’s
requirements pertaining to third party
conformity assessment bodies can be
found at 16 CFR part 1112.
Estimated Respondent Burden:
• Application Burden.
The application for CPSC acceptance
of accreditation is completed by
submitting a Consumer Product
Conformity Assessment Body
Registration Form (CPSC Form 223); an
accreditation certificate for ISO/IEC
17025, General requirements for the
competence of testing and calibration
laboratories; and a statement of scope
that clearly identifies each CPSC rule
and/or test method for which CPSC
acceptance is sought. 16 CFR 1112.13(a).
For independent third party conformity
assessment bodies, the estimated time to
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
complete the initial application
materials is 75 minutes. For
governmental and firewalled third party
conformity assessment bodies, the
estimate is longer because of their
additional requirements. See 16 CFR
1112.13(b)–(c). Firewalled third party
conformity assessment bodies will
require an estimated 8.4 hours to
develop and upload their requirements
to the CPSC. Governmental third party
conformity assessment bodies will
require three hours to develop and
upload their requirements to the CPSC.
Based on applications received from
FY 2020 to FY 2024, we estimate
receiving 40 new applications from
independent third party conformity
assessment bodies, three applications
from firewalled third party conformity
assessment bodies, and four
applications from governmental third
party conformity assessment bodies,
each year.
Therefore, we estimate the total
hourly burden for new applications to
be 87.2 hours, comprised of 50 hours for
independent bodies (75 minutes per
independent application × 40
applications = 3,000 minutes or 50
hours), 25.2 hours for firewalled bodies
(8.4 hours per firewalled application ×
3 applications = 25.2 hours) and 12
hours for government bodies (3 hours
per governmental application × 4
applications = 12 hours).
• Updating Information Burden.
To update the information on CPSC
Form 223, third party conformity
assessment bodies will not need to fill
out an entirely new form to submit new
information. They can access their
existing CPSC Form 223 via the third
party conformity assessment body
application program on the CPSC’s
website and change only those elements
that need updating. From FY 2020
through the first half of 2025, there has
been a large increase in additions to
scope applications submitted each year.
The additions to scope applications
accommodate new testing related to
toys, furniture, batteries and durable
nursery products. We estimate it will
take a third party conformity assessment
body 30 minutes to update its
information to add scope items. Further,
we estimate that about 20 percent of the
approximately 670 third party
conformity assessment bodies will do
this per year, for an estimated 134
addition to scope applications annually.
Therefore, we estimate the total hourly
burden to update information to be 67
hours (134 applications per year × 30
minutes per application = 4,020 minutes
or 67 hours per year).
• Third Party Disclosure Burden.
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
File Type | application/pdf |
File Modified | 2025-09-12 |
File Created | 2025-09-12 |