60 Day FR Notice

30891

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 131 / Friday, July 11, 2025 / Notices
TABLE 4—ESTIMATE OF FILING FEES FOR CPCS
Additional cost

Number of
respondents
(importers)

Number of
filings with
a fee

Total number
of responses

Cost per
response

Total
burden cost

CPC Filing Fee ....................................................................

224,000

127

28,555,603

$0.77

$21,987,815

Request for Comments
The Commission solicits written
comments from all interested persons
about the proposed renewal of this
collection of information. The
Commission specifically solicits
information relevant to the following
topics:
• Whether the collection of
information described above is
necessary for the proper performance of
the Commission’s functions, including
whether the information would have
practical utility;
• Whether the estimated burden of
the proposed collection of information
is accurate;
• Whether the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected
could be enhanced; and
• Whether the burden imposed by the
collection of information could be
minimized by use of automated,
electronic or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms of
information technology.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2025–12979 Filed 7–10–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2012–0055]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Extension of Collection;
Comment Request; Standards for the
Flammability of Children’s Sleepwear
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
AGENCY:

As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the
Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC or Commission) requests
comments on a proposed extension of
approval of information collection
requirements associated with the
Standard for the Flammability of
Children’s Sleepwear: Sizes 0 Through
6X and the Standard for the
Flammability of Children’s Sleepwear:
Sizes 7 Through 14. The Office of

khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:33 Jul 10, 2025

Jkt 265001

Management and Budget (OMB)
previously approved the collection of
information under control number
3041–0027. OMB’s most recent
extension of approval will expire on
September 30, 2025. The Commission
will consider all comments received in
response to this notice before requesting
an extension of this collection of
information from OMB.
DATES: Submit comments on the
collection of information by September
9, 2025.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2012–
0055, within 60 days of publication of
this notice by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit through this website:
confidential business information, trade
secret information, or other sensitive or
protected information that you do not
want to be available to the public. The
Commission typically does not accept
comments submitted by email, except as
described below.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier/Written
Submissions: CPSC encourages you to
submit electronic comments by using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal. You
may, however, submit comments by
mail/hand delivery/courier to: Office of
the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East-West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814;
telephone (301) 504–7479.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. CPSC
may post all comments without change,
including any personal identifiers,
contact information, or other personal
information provided, to: https://
www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
submit confidential business
information, trade secret information, or
other sensitive or protected information
that you do not want to be available to
the public, you may submit such
comments by mail, hand delivery, or
courier, or you may email them to cpscos@cpsc.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://

PO 00000

Frm 00056

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

www.regulations.gov, insert docket
number CPSC–2012–0055 into the
‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Gillham, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East-West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301)
504–7791, or by email to: pra@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CPSC
seeks to renew the following currently
approved collection of information:
Title: Standard for the Flammability
of Children’s Sleepwear: Sizes 0
Through 6X; and the Standard for the
Flammability of Children’s Sleepwear:
Sizes 7 Through 14.
OMB Number: 3041–0027.
Type of Review: Renewal of
collection.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: Manufacturers and
importers of children’s sleepwear.
General Description of Collection: The
Standard for the Flammability of
Children’s Sleepwear: Sizes 0 through
6X (16 CFR part 1615) and the Standard
for the Flammability of Children’s
Sleepwear: Sizes 7 through 14 (16 CFR
part 1616) address the fire hazard
associated with small-flame ignition
sources for children’s sleepwear
manufactured for sale in, or imported
into, the United States. The standards
also require manufacturers and
importers of children’s sleepwear to
collect information resulting from
product testing and maintenance of the
testing records. 16 CFR part 1615,
subpart B; 16 CFR part 1616; subpart B.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
Based on a review of past inspections
and published industry information,
CPSC staff estimates that there could be
as many as 615 domestic children’s
apparel manufacturers in the United
States subject to the rule. However, not
all these manufacturers will produce
children’s sleepwear. Therefore, this
figure is likely an overestimate of the
actual number of firms responding to
the collection of information in any
given year. Furthermore, using the
Harmonized Tariff System (HTS) codes
for children’s sleepwear, CPSC staff
found approximately 3,641 importers
that supply children’s sleepwear to the
U.S. market. Many of the 615 domestic
manufacturers, along with many large
U.S. retailers, may be among the
importers, so this too could be an

E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM

11JYN1

khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES

30892

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 131 / Friday, July 11, 2025 / Notices

overestimate of respondents to the
information collection. If all 615 U.S.
producers and all 3,641 importers
introduced new children’s sleepwear
garments each year, the total number of
respondents to the information
collection would be 4,256 (615 + 3,641).
As noted above, the actual number of
respondents is likely lower.
Estimated Time per Response: PRA
burden associated with testing and
recordkeeping of each sleepwear item is
approximately three hours.
Total Estimated Annual Burden: The
50 largest domestic manufacturers and
the 100 largest importers may each
introduce an average of 100 new
children’s sleepwear items annually.
The annual burden for the 50 large
domestic manufacturers and the 100
largest importers is estimated at 45,000
hours for PRA burden associated with
testing and recordkeeping (150 firms ×
100 items × 3 hours). Without adjusting
for possible double-counting, CPSC staff
estimates that the remaining 565
manufacturers and 3,541 importers may
each introduce an average of 10 new
children’s sleepwear items, for a total
burden of 123,180 hours (4,106 × 10
items × 3 hours.) Therefore, the total
estimated potential annual burden
imposed by the standard and
regulations on all manufacturers and
importers of children’s sleepwear will
be about 168,180 hours (45,000 +
123,180).
Total Estimated Annual Cost to
Respondents: Using compensation data
available from the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics, ‘‘Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation,’’ December
2024, Table 4, total compensation for
management, professional, and related
workers in goods-producing private
industries, http://www.bls.gov/ncs, the
annual cost to the industry is estimated
to be $12,748,044 based on an hourly
wage of $75.80 × 168,180 hours.
Request for Comments:
The Commission solicits written
comments from all interested persons
about the proposed collection of
information. The Commission
specifically solicits information relevant
to the following topics:
• whether the collection of
information described above is
necessary for the proper performance of
the Commission’s functions, including
whether the information would have
practical utility;
• whether the estimated burden of the
proposed collection of information is
accurate;
• whether the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected
could be enhanced; and

VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:33 Jul 10, 2025

Jkt 265001

• whether the burden imposed by the
collection of information could be
minimized by use of automated,
electronic or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms of
information technology.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2025–13013 Filed 7–10–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
Optimization of the Powder River
Training Complex
Department of the Air Force,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:

The Department of the Air
Force (DAF) is issuing this Notice of
Intent (NOI) to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
to assess the potential social, economic,
and environmental impacts associated
with optimization of the Powder River
Training Complex (PRTC) (Unique
Identification Number EISX–007–57–
UAF–1729171028). The EIS will analyze
the potential impacts from
improvements to the airspace structure
at PRTC to address shortfalls in day-today training for aircrews from Ellsworth
Air Force Base (AFB) and Minot AFB
and increasing Large Force Exercise
(LFE) capability at PRTC to meet threats
to National Security. The Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) is
participating as a cooperating agency.
DATES: A public scoping period will run
through September 9, 2025. Comments
will be accepted at any time during the
environmental impact analysis process;
however, to ensure DAF has sufficient
time to consider public scoping
comments during preparation of the
Draft EIS, please submit comments
within the defined scoping period. A
schedule is provided on the project
website (www.PRTCairspaceEIS.com)
and will be updated as the project
progresses.
DAF invites the public, stakeholders,
and other interested parties to attend a
public scoping meeting. Scoping
meetings will be held on the following
dates, times, and locations:
• July 28, 2025, 5:00 p.m.–7:00 p.m.,
Hardin, MT
• July 29, 2025, 5:00 p.m.–7:00 p.m.,
Ashland, MT
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00057

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

• July 30, 2025, 5:00 p.m.–7:00 p.m.,
Baker, MT
• July 31, 2025, 5:00 p.m.–7:00 p.m.,
Bowman, ND
• August 1, 2025, 5:00 p.m.–7:00 p.m.,
Elgin, ND
• August 11, 2025, 5:00 p.m.–7:00 p.m.,
Spearfish, SD
• August 12, 2025, 5:00 p.m.–7:00 p.m.,
Bison, SD
• August 13, 2025, 5:00 p.m.–7:00 p.m.,
Sundance, WY
• August 14, 2025, 5:00 p.m.–7:00 p.m.,
Rapid City, SD
• August 19, 2025, 5:00 p.m.–6:00 p.m.,
Virtual Meeting #1
• August 20, 2025, 5:00 p.m.–6:00 p.m.,
Virtual Meeting #2
• August 21, 2025, 5:00 p.m.–6:00 p.m.,
Virtual Meeting #3
All meeting times are in mountain
time. For information on the virtual
scoping meetings and to view meeting
materials please see the project website
(www.PRTCairspaceEIS.com).
ADDRESSES: The addresses for the inperson public scoping meetings listed in
the DATES section will be published in
local newspapers and on the project
website a minimum of 15 days prior to
the meetings. Written scoping
comments can be submitted at an inperson scoping meeting, via the project
website (www.PRTCairspaceEIS.com),
or via postal mail to Attn. PRTC
Airspace EIS, 501 Butler Farm Rd., Suite
H, Hampton, VA 23666.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
inquiries regarding accommodations
under the Americans with Disability
Act, please contact Grace Keesling,
NEPA Project Manager at
AFCEC.CIE.airspace.workflow@
us.af.mil, or by phone at 1–380–458–
2617.
The
purpose of the Proposed Action is to
facilitate training that ensures combat
effectiveness and aircrew survivability.
The Proposed Action is needed because
the current PRTC does not allow
aircrews to complete required high
altitude day-to-day and LFE training,
and because current limitations on LFEs
prevent realistic training that ensures
mission readiness and aircrew
survivability.
DAF is considering two alternatives to
implement the Proposed Action and the
No Action Alternative.
For Alternative 1, the ceiling of two
of the primary airspace segments used
for day-to-day training (named Powder
River 2 and Gateway West Air Traffic
Control Assigned Airspaces [ATCAAs])
would be raised to 60,000 feet from the
current 26,000 feet, improving the highaltitude training capability. This

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

E:\FR\FM\11JYN1.SGM

11JYN1